Friday, October 17, 2014

Robert Bruce Duncan chits on BCSC daily - CCB.v

So our anti-hero of massive, back slapping proportion continues to post "ad naseum" on Stockhouse. Here's the latest CONFIRMED public spewing of Mr. Robert Bruce Duncan.
"WolverineTrader. The time has come for people to fully understand what is behind your posting behavior. As some of you are aware, Canada Carbon and myself have filed a number of criminal complaints with the Peel Regional Police in Ontario. Specifically, one of the complaints was filed against WolverineTrader.

Subsequent to the investigation which has been handed off now to a Criminal Cyber Unit, it will ultimately be decided by a Crown Counsel whether charges should be filed. I can confirm that Canada Carbon and its management has made it very clear that we will press charges.

In closing, no officers or directors of publicly traded companies or their family members should be the subject of criminal harassment and the uttering of the threats.

Bruce Duncan, CEO Canada Carbon Inc."

Read more at http://www.stockhouse.com/companies/bullboard/v.ccb/canada-carbon-inc#ffSOelptCWsoueaX.99
So not only is Mr. Duncan openly chitting on existing stakeholders through grotesquely flawed disclosure ... he CONTINUES to bait and threaten the public at every possible turn. Posting on SH is a very direct, very obvious securities offense. Why then does Mr. Duncan keep doing it every waking hour?
The very simple bottom line here is that Mr. Robert Bruce Duncan has been busted multiple times breaking securities laws and since he keeps doing it he must believe the rules simply don't apply to him at all.

That pretty well sums up the useless as fukkin hell BCSC and a body could probably march in with Mr. Duncan's affidavit and those useless fukkers would STILL be "good" for fuk all.

Regarding Mr. Duncan's stooopidity related to the many, many threats of criminal charges against the public? The man is appearing to be losing touch with reality, and the fact he spends every hour on SH makes that conclusion obvious. It's HIS conduct that is both improper and yes, illegal.